asia for the asians, africa for the africans, white countries for everybody!.
everybody says there is this race problem.
everybody says this race problem will be solved when the third world pours into every white country and only into white countries.. the netherlands and belgium are just as crowded as japan or taiwan, but nobody says japan or taiwan will solve this race problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.. everybody says the final solution to this race problem is for every white country and only white countries to assimilate, i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.. what if i said there was this race problem and this race problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into every black country and only into black countries?.
The only excuse for that post is if you are drunk, but even then not so much.
When i see economic migrants on the news trying every which way to get into the UK when they are already in the EU I think it sucks.
When I see boat loads of refugees fleeing warzones like Syria, then we should be reaching out to take them in. (subject to some rather obvious precautions)
with all the talk about the org's policies and failures regarding child sexual abuse being publically exposed in australia, i thought that it may be a good time to highlight this... i apologise if this has already been discussed, but on the 9th of july the independent inquiry into child sexual abuse in england and wales was opened.
here is some information regarding it's aims.. "about the inquiry.
the inquiry offers an unprecedented opportunity to examine the extent to which institutions and organisations in england and wales have taken seriously their responsibility to protect children.. the inquiry will investigate a wide range of institutions including:.
Quote from their site:
In conducting its work, the Inquiry is liaising with the Australian Royal Commission into Institutional Child Sexual Abuse, with the Independent Jersey Care Inquiry, with the Historical Institutional Abuse Inquiry in Northern Ireland, and with the Scottish Inquiry into Historical Abuse of Children in Care. Together the inquiries have much to learn from each other.
They are well aware of the ARC already which is good and liaising with it.
I think it will need a couple of real cases of abuse from the UK much like the Australian inquiry for them to get their teeth into if you want it to be featured.
But then if they closely liaising with other inquiries like the RCA they may not want to rehash the same turf and may choose to go a different route. I hope they rehash it of course and equally as in depth as the ARC did.
one member of a similar spanish speaking forum has found something quite interesting.. it is quite funny to see that gb members do not really realize how their belongings are really showing them as a fraud.
do you expect to see a gb wearing a 17000 us$ iwatch when answering to a court.
geoffrey jackson does !.
Even if it was "just a gift" if that is the excuse for such things, then gifts can be refused, you do NOT have to accept that fancy rolex or $17000 iwatch.
In fact I reckon it would be immodest to accept it or even allow anyone to believe that you might accept it. You'd go out of your way to prevent anyone from imagining it was a suitable gift to give in the 1st place thus avoiding the possible situation and awkwardness all round if someone was to offer it.
if these are gifts then the ones accepting them have no shame and no ethics. If they are bought with their own money then they have no shame and no ethics. If they are rewards from corporate deals then they have no shame and no ethics.
There is no set of circumstances in which it is OK for a GB member to wear such items without looking like a complete sham.
So keep it up you gormless 7, you may wake a few more up that way.
so i was fooled by the witnesses.
what can i learn from that?
not to accept things at face value but to seek out opinion and different view points.. hence my question " do you believe man landed on the moon?.
so i was fooled by the witnesses.
what can i learn from that?
not to accept things at face value but to seek out opinion and different view points.. hence my question " do you believe man landed on the moon?.
we have the convention this weekend and many jw families are arriving.
one family that ive known for many years from new mexico stopped by to visit my mom.
hes been an elder since the 80s.
Excellently done.
so i was fooled by the witnesses.
what can i learn from that?
not to accept things at face value but to seek out opinion and different view points.. hence my question " do you believe man landed on the moon?.
Here's the speech you keep harping on about: http://history.nasa.gov/Bush%20SEP.htm
Bet you dont read it....
If you cant be bothered to search for it yourself and read it already to make sure you know what you are talking about before posting about it, i doubt you'll read it when someone else posts it for you.
Hmmm, about 10 seconds on google found that, not too hard is it?
so i was fooled by the witnesses.
what can i learn from that?
not to accept things at face value but to seek out opinion and different view points.. hence my question " do you believe man landed on the moon?.
Haha the retarded comments on that link are priceless...
so i was fooled by the witnesses.
what can i learn from that?
not to accept things at face value but to seek out opinion and different view points.. hence my question " do you believe man landed on the moon?.
By the way, it took me exactly two minutes to find this information.
Which was why i didnt give it as i knew Rebel isnt really interested in the answers. This isnt about answers after all is it.
i think Viv has the right idea with the poop memes, that's all this thread deserves right now.
let me start off by saying i do not presume to have the answers, i am merely offering advice.. i will preface this posting with this, cutting a long story short:.
my sister was raped by a popular jw lad wh's dad happen to be a rock star elder.
in the attempt to fight him off his face was covered with scratches and it was reported to the police ( instead of rape he was sentenced on the lesser charges of sexual battery and assault) but he confessed to having violent, consentual sex.
